Remove Children Remove Nonprofit Administration and Development Remove Urban development
article thumbnail

Shifting the Harmful Narratives and Practices of Work Requirements

NonProfit Quarterly

The narrative roots of attaching work requirements to public benefits have been developing since the racist and sexist ideologies of slavery in the United States. That’s not career development. These women were forced to put their children in dangerous situations because of work requirements. They are administratively efficient.

article thumbnail

We Must Be Founders

Stanford Social Innovation Review

Piecemeal responses will be chipped away, from administration to administration. What if we had a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that took its mandate to ensure human flourishing rather than real estate profit? I invite you to imagine with me what this would look like.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The EPA Launches Final Strategy on Lead Mitigation

NonProfit Quarterly

Even small amounts of lead can lead to severe adverse health effects in children , including issues with learning, brain and nervous system development, hearing and speech, and arrested growth. Exposure to lead during pregnancy can lead to developmental or behavioral problems in children later on.

article thumbnail

Tenants Nationwide Call for Social Housing Now!

NonProfit Quarterly

It can include quality public housing, permanently affordable and accessible housing owned by mission-driven nonprofits, supportive housing for the recently unhoused, as well as models for nonprofit community control such as resident-owned community land trusts and limited equity cooperatives. Social Housing for Whom?

article thumbnail

Project 2025: What Does It Mean for Racial and Economic Justice?

NonProfit Quarterly

The document has been widely described as a “ blueprint ” for a possible incoming Donald Trump administration. Of the 30 chapters, 25 have lead authors who held policy positions in the Trump administration. Of the 30 chapters, 25 have lead authors who held policy positions in the Trump administration. That is not quite accurate.